|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 302-309
Ofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: An increasing concern
Ramesh S Kumar1, K. R. Uma Devi2, Azger Dusthackeer3, Christy Rosaline Nirmal3
1 Department of Clinical Research, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Immunology, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Bacteriology, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Submission||06-Nov-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||11-Aug-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||30-Sep-2021|
Dr. Ramesh S Kumar
ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Madurai Unit, Ward 62, Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai - 625 020, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Multidrug resistance tuberculosis (MDR-TB) associated with the development of resistance to fluoroquinolones (FQs) especially ofloxacin is a matter of concern, as they had been earlier recommended drugs for usage in the MDR-TB treatment regimens, and moxifloxacin and other quinolones are still on the list. Mycobacterium tuberculosis acquires resistance to FQs mainly through mutations in the quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs) of the gyrA gene and less frequently in the gyrB gene. A literature search on the geographical distribution of ofloxacin resistance in TB shows that there is a mild surge in reporting of the resistance to ofloxacin in tuberculosis patients. Molecular tests demonstrating mutations in gyrA and gyrB genes is widely used to detect ofloxacin resistance and the broadly available commercial assay for the rapid detection of second-line-drug resistance, including FQ resistance, the GenoType MTBDRsl assay (Hain Life science, Nehren, Germany), detects the most common mutations found in the QRDR of gyrA while its new version 2.0 detects mutations in the gyrB as well. It has been shown that on reviewing the frequency and geographic distribution of gyrA and gyr B mutations associated with FQ resistance, there do exist geographic differences in the frequencies within and across countries. Cross-resistance to FQs is an area of concern, although some studies show that concordance in resistance among the FQ agents, lower level of cross-resistance has also been reported. The presence of ofloxacin resistance is an alarm signal while Moxifloxacin and other FQs are still the recommended drugs for the resistant TB cases. The WHO recommendation that ofloxacin be phased out from MDR-TB regimens is well justified. It is important that rationale usage of ofloxacin is needed for preventing ofloxacin resistance, to aid in the management of tuberculosis.
Keywords: GyrA, gyrB, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, ofloxacin, resistance
|How to cite this article:|
Kumar RS, Devi KR, Dusthackeer A, Nirmal CR. Ofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: An increasing concern. Indian J Health Sci Biomed Res 2021;14:302-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Kumar RS, Devi KR, Dusthackeer A, Nirmal CR. Ofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: An increasing concern. Indian J Health Sci Biomed Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 28];14:302-9. Available from: https://www.ijournalhs.org/text.asp?2021/14/3/302/327261
| Introduction|| |
In recent years, the alarming increase in drug-resistant tuberculosis is a great concern in major parts of the world. Failure of adherence to treatment regimens and mismanagement of drugs seems to be the major reasons for the increase in drug-resistant tuberculosis cases, especially in developing countries. Many concerns are in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) which is resistant to rifampicin and isoniazid, and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB), which is defined as MDR-TB plus resistant to at least one of the fluoroquinolones (FQs) and any one of the second-line injectable drugs (SLID). Globally, 3.5% of new TB cases and 18% of previously treated cases had MDR/rifampicin resistance (RR) and among the cases of MDR-TB in 2017, 8.5% (95% confidence interval, 6.2%–11%) were estimated to have XDR-TB. Another form of drug-resistant TB, pre-XDR-TB, which is resistant to isoniazid, rifampicin and any one of the FQs or SLID, but not both FQ and SLID, is also a concern. Totally drug-resistant TB, resistant to all of the first-line and second-line drugs, and polypeptide, thioamide, cycloserine, and para-aminosalicylic acid, have been reported in Italy, Iran, India, and South Africa. The treatment for MDR/XDR-TB is long and challenged by the high frequency of adverse drug events, high costs, and low treatment success rates. FQs and SLID play a crucial role in the successful treatment of MDR-TB. When resistance emerges to any one of these two groups of drugs among MDR-TB, the treatment becomes more complex. Both forms of pre-XDR-TB, ofloxacin-resistant and SLID-resistant pre-XDR-TB have been reported to be associated with poor survival and so the XDR-TB.
When patients are diagnosed initially with drug-resistant tuberculosis they are defined as primary drug resistance, and they are assumed to have transmitted with drug-resistant strains. When wildtype pan-susceptible bacteria mutate into drug-resistant strains during the course of treatment, it is referred to as acquired resistance. In the case of FQs, its usage in other respiratory infections is reported to be a cause for the emergence of FQ-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Wang et al. reported that empirical use of FQs for presumed bacterial infection delays the treatment for TB and consequently results in poorer prognosis, and most likely associated with FQ resistance. Similarly, Devasia et al. reported the high risk of FQ-resistant tuberculosis among individuals who received FQs for more than 10 days, particularly more than 60 days before tuberculosis diagnosis. The proportion of MDR-TB cases with resistance to any of the FQs (ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin) is reported to be 21%. These findings strongly indicate the need for early and prompt diagnosis and appropriate usage of the antimicrobials to avoid the emergence of drug resistance.
The WHO treatment guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis, has recommended that ofloxacin be phased out from MDR-TB regimens. A literature search on the ofloxacin resistance in TB across the world showed that there is an increase of ofloxacin resistance and we feel it was very appropriate that ofloxacin may be phased out from the MDR-TB regimens
| Fluoroquinolones, Mechanism of Action, and Development of Resistance|| |
FQs form an important class of antibiotics listed among the second-line drugs used for the management of MDR-TB. They belong to a family of broad-spectrum, systemic antibacterial agents and are commonly used as therapeutic agents for respiratory and urinary tract infections. They are active against a wide range of aerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. The FQ are classified into four generations and OFX comes under second generation while moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin come under third-generation FQs, the three FQs widely used for MDR-TB. The basic mechanism of action of all FQs is similar and they all inhibit DNA synthesis by targeting DNA gyrase. In M. tuberculosis DNA gyrase is encoded by DNA gyrase subunits A (gyrA, Rv0006), and DNA gyrase subunits B (gyrB, Rv0005). Since the DNA gyrase is essential for DNA replication and transcription of the bacteria, its inhibition results in bactericidal activity. Therefore, mutations in the quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR) of gyrA predominantly and to a lesser extent in gyrB, cause resistance to FQ. Alternate mechanisms, namely, efflux pumps,, mutations in parE in Streptococcus pneumonia, parC and parE genes in Salmonella More Details enterica have also been reported to cause FQ-resistance.
| Ofloxacin in the Management of Tuberculosis|| |
As per the WHO treatment guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis, 2016 update, it was recommended that ofloxacin be phased out from MDR-TB regimens and ciprofloxacin to be never used due to the limited evidence of their effectiveness and recommended the use of later-generation FQs (defined for these guidelines as high-dose levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin) as they significantly improve treatment outcomes in adults with RR-TB and MDR-TB. Regarding the usage of ofloxacin in drug-sensitive TB, in some clinical studies, ofloxacin has been tried but had not made any big impact, and better and newer FQs containing regimens are being studied for TB. Also, WHO TB treatment guidelines recommend not to use any 4-month FQ containing regimen for drug-sensitive TB. But it is to be reminded that WHO consistently recommends FQs for drug-sensitive TB in cases of intolerance of standard first-line drugs, particularly hepatotoxicity if there were no options, and there is a chance that ofloxacin may be used by the treating physician at that time due to its wider availability and that could be an occasion where ofloxacin is exposed to a patient with TB.
| Geographical Distribution in OFX Resistance|| |
In 2018, Zignol et al., reported in an analysis across Asian countries, and the overall pooled sensitivity values for genetic sequencing among all tuberculosis cases were 85% (77–91) for gyrA and gyrB combined (ofloxacin resistance), and 88% (81–92) for gyrA and gyrB combined (moxifloxacin resistance). A literature search using PubMed, on the geographical distribution of ofloxacin resistance in TB shows that there is a mild surge in reporting of the resistance to ofloxacin in tuberculosis patients. The main findings of each of these studies are reported in [Table 1] and [Table 2] show a summary of FQs resistance among various clinical isolates.
|Table 1: Geographical distribution of ofloxacin resistance: summary from a literature review|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Summary of fluoroquinolones resistance among various clinical isolates with 95% confidence intervals|
Click here to view
| Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of Ofloxacin Resistance|| |
There is uncertainty about how to interpret results from drug susceptibility testing (DST) against FQs. Three general methods used for determining drug susceptibility of M. tuberculosis are the proportion method, absolute concentration method (MIC method) and the resistance ratio method. Phenotypic DST for ofloxacin is generally carried out by the absolute concentration method or by proportion sensitivity method. The WHO (2018) recommended critical concentrations for moxifloxacin was 0.25–1.0 μg/ml and for ofloxacin 1.0–2.0 μg/ml in various media. MIC revaluation of the critical concentration for Ofloxacin should be attempted to validate the WHO recommended ones and this was suggested to be different in every geographical area and there is more literature evidence for this effect.
| Molecular Tests to Detect Resistance to OFX and gyrA and gyrB Mutations|| |
Currently, the phenotype-based approach is the diagnostic gold standard in determining the FQ resistance. However, recent advances in molecular diagnostics technology enable us to assess the resistance rapidly. The gyrA and gyrB genes were directly amplified from the DNA of 41 Mtb clinical isolates and mutation were confirmed by sequencing. Primers were designed for M. tuberculosis acquires resistance to the FQs mainly through mutations in the QRDRs of the gyrA gene and less frequently, in the gyrB gene. Agreement between genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility has been reported to be high (≥97%) by various studies.,, The broadly available commercial assay for the rapid detection of second-line-drug resistance, including FQ resistance, the MTBDRsl assay (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany), detects the most common mutations of the QRDR of gyrA. The new version of GenoType MTBDRsl (v2.0) includes mutations in the gyrB at codons 536–541, in addition to gyrA. The accuracy of the FQ resistance detection by MTBDRsl v2.0 was found to be 97% with sensitivity and specificity of 93.0% and 98.3%, respectively. For ofloxacin alone sensitivity and specificity were calculated to be 92.9% and 97.7%, respectively. The WHO expert group suggested GenoType MTBDRsl assay be used for “rule-in” test of FQ resistance though it cannot be used as a replacement test for conventional DST.
| Geographical Distribution of gyrA and gyrB Mutations|| |
Globally, several studies have been undertaken to identify mutations in gyrA and gyrB to explain OFX-resistance from different parts of the world including from China, and India,,,, and Russia,, where more than half of the MDR-TB patients are reported. In a study conducted in 41 clinical isolates, they have found that mutation in gyrA, shows resistance to moxifloxacin and susceptible to ofloxacin. In a meta-analysis which included 19 articles from 22 independent studies, the sensitivity and specificity of MTBDRsl were reported to be 86.9% and 97.3% respectively for FQs. Similarly, Theron et al. reported pooled sensitivity and specificity of MTBDRsl based on (i) culture isolates confirmed as TB positive (indirectly) to 83.1% and 97.7% respectively and (ii) smear-positive sputum specimens (directly) to be 85.1% and 98.2%, respectively. Furthermore, another systematic review revealed that only 80% OFX-resistant of M. tuberculosis strains to have mutations in gyrA that are also covered in GenoType MTBDRsl.
The frequency and nature of drug-resistant mutations are known to be varying between countries or regions that add complexities in predicting the resistance precisely like that of phenotypic determination. Sandgren et al. established a comprehensive database of drug-resistant mutations for tuberculosis; the database also contains high-confidence drug-resistant mutations listed based on the relative frequency of the most common mutations associated with resistance to specific drugs. In this database, mutations from gyrA, at codons 74, 89-91, 94, and 102, and from gyrB at codon 510 are listed as high-confidence mutations conferring FQ-resistance. The GenoType MTBDRsl is used widely now to detect FQ-resistant mutations rapidly based on the mutations at codons A90V, S91P, D94A, D94N/Y, D94G, and D94H. The diversity and frequency of mutations by a systematic review conducted by Avalos et al. included a total of 3846 unique clinical M. tuberculosis isolates with phenotypic resistance profile, from 18 different countries covered in 46 studies. Mutations A90V and D94G were reported as the most frequently occurring in 14 of the 18 countries included in this systematic review. However, the frequency of FQ-resistant mutations was reported to be different between India and China where drug-resistant TB is reported to be very high. In India, the most commonly reported mutations were D94A (20%) followed by A90V (10%) and D94G (9%), which were all covered in MTBDRsl. On the other hand, in China, the frequency of D94A was only 8%, while D94G and A90V were 28% and 18%, respectively. Further, in the gyrB, mutation N538D (also reported as N510D), D500H, T539N, and A543V were reported to be rare (at frequencies of <1%) among ofloxacin-resistant isolates.
The genotypes of M. tuberculosis have also been reported to influence the drug resistance, which also differs between various regions and countries. For example, CAS lineage predominantly present in North and North-West India (up to 62.3%) the EAI strains are dominant in South India (44% in Chennai) while the Beijing lineage are present in all over India (17.2%) through its presence is very high in North-Eastern parts of India (65.6% in Assam and 25.3% in Kolkata region). Beijing genotype has been reported to be associated with multidrug resistance as well as extensively drug resistance TB. Based on molecular surveillance of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis conducted during 2003-2007 in 24 European countries, it was found that majority of the MDR and XDR genotypes were Beijing. Zhang et al. reported significantly higher proportions of ofloxacin-resistant and pre-XDR isolates in Beijing strains than non-Beijing strains. A similar association of Beijing genotype of M. tuberculosis with FQ resistance was also reported from Vietnam. These results indicate the need for exploring other plausible mechanisms, including the relevance of geography and genotype of the bacteria with drug resistance.
| Other Methods of Diagnosing Ofloxacin Resistance|| |
However, it must be reminded that as the conventional DST tests are slow and laborious, and molecular genetic tests are too expensive although fast, detection of ofloxacin resistance in M. tuberculosis by low-cost colorimetric methods, namely resazurin and nitrate reductase assays are good alternate options for future testing the susceptibility of ofloxacin, as study has shown that the results are concurrent with the standard and test results are available in an average of 10 days.
Recent developments in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and bioinformatics enable rapid determination of resistance for all of the drugs for which resistant mutations are known. For example, TB-Profiler, a new bioinformatics tool can predict resistant mutations for a total of 11 different TB drugs including OFX from WGS of M. tuberculosis; sensitivity and specificity of TB-Profiler for OFX are 85.5% and 94.9%, respectively. The accuracy of prediction by TB-Profiler was reported to vary between countries supporting the fact that there could be a difference in the frequency of geographical distribution of mutations causing drug resistance. Johana et al. determined the MIC of ciprofloxacin in 13 clinical isolates using new Raman spectroscopy.
| Cross-Resistance-a Matter of Concern|| |
FQ DST is an important step in the design of effective treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Ofloxacin is also being used for other infectious diseases and they could pave a way for cross-resistance to other FQs. In most occasions, the DST pattern result obtained for anyone of the FQ is considered as the results applicable for any of the other FQs. While some studies support the occurrence of cross-resistance and suggest to avoid usage of any FQs if resistance is found in any one member, whereas others favor in the usage of other FQ even with resistance to anyone FQ. Studies have reported concordance in the DST pattern of FQs in M. tb; 100% concordance between resistance to moxifloxacin and ofloxacin and high concordance among ofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin resistance have been reported. Similarly, Willby et al. observed a high degree of cross-resistance between OFX, MFX, and LVX from USA. However, studies have demonstrated significantly better treatment outcomes among OFX-resistant MDR-TB when susceptible to moxifloxacin and treated with a regimen containing later generation of FQs (levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, mainly the latter). Sirgel et al. reported clinical relevance of using moxifloxacin in the treatment of OFX-resistant TB. Furthermore, the WHO earlier recommended moxifloxacin for the therapy of ofloxacin-resistant TB.
M. tuberculosis isolates with mutations at Ala90Val or Ser91Pro were reported to have higher MIC90 for OFX (4.0 μg/ml) and lower MIC90 (1.0 μg/ml) MXF thus, indicated for standard or increased MXF dosing for clinical MTB isolates shown to have these mutations. Furthermore, a study from Peru demonstrated lower concordance in resistance among three FQ (CFX, OFX, and MFX), with one-third to half of the strains showing no agreement among the three agents. The discrepancy observed, in particular, the high rates of CFX/OFX-resistant isolates that were intermediate or susceptible to MFX, a finding which was also demonstrated from India, suggest that DST should be performed for the specific FQ planned for clinical use. The WHO reports that while resistance-conferring mutations to FQs detected by the MTBDRsl assay are highly correlated with phenotypic resistance to ofloxacin and levofloxacin, the correlation with moxifloxacin (and gatifloxacin) is less clear and the inclusion of moxifloxacin in an MDR-TB regimen is best guided by phenotypic DST results. We feel that the surge in the ofloxacin resistance is a matter of concern with the available literature on cross-resistance among the quinolones.
| Public Health Relevance and Programmatic Implications of Ofloxacin Resistance|| |
Public health and programmatic implications on this increase in ofloxacin resistance in TB are many. One must realize that this ofloxacin resistance TB stain is being transmitted from the infected person to the community and this increase in the prevalence of ofloxacin resistance is an area of concern, especially in high TB burden countries. At present, in most low- and middle-income countries, DST is done only in a fraction of all cases leading to a large number of undetected ofloxacin drug-resistant TB. And even if DST has done routinely, it is often only done in retreatment cases resulting in delayed diagnosis of ofloxacin resistance in M. tuberculosis DST methods for the second-line drugs, especially for the FQs are not wider application tests in the low and middle income, high TB burden countries, although it is being scaled up in the Indian TB control program. This leaves a need for improving the TB diagnostic laboratories to upgrade themselves in diagnosing the ofloxacin resistance. Also, ofloxacin being used to treat new TB patients at the time of severe adverse reaction to first-line drugs, given the scenario where ofloxacin resistance testing not being done routinely, could end up treating with inappropriate regimen as there could be a chance of them being affected by ofloxacin resistance stain, given the prevalence of increase in ofloxacin resistance as evidenced by this review. Most importantly with the available literature evidence of cross-resistance, this increase in ofloxacin resistance is a matter of concern.
To conclude, the surge of ofloxacin resistance is a concern and we feel that the WHO had rightly decided to phase out ofloxacin in the management of resistant TB. However, in high TB burden countries with limited resources, it is suggested that scaling up of DST facilities specific to all second-line TB drugs are need of the hour.
The authors would like to thank Dr.Soumya Swaminathan, former Director-General, Indian Council of Medical Research, for her support for developing this review. We would like to thank Dr.Jagdish Chandrabose Sundaramoorthi former Scientist C, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, for contributing in the retrieval of relevant references.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Nathanson E, Lambregts-van Weezenbeek C, Rich ML, Gupta R, Bayona J, Blöndal K, et al.
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis management in resource-limited settings. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:1389-97.
Kozińska M, Brzostek A, Krawiecka D, Rybczyńska M, Zwolska Z, Augustynowicz-Kopeć E. MDR, pre-XDR and XDR drug-resistant tuberculosis in Poland in 2000-2009. Pneumonol Alergol Pol 2011;79:278-87.
Kim DH, Kim HJ, Park SK, Kong SJ, Kim YS, Kim TH, et al.
Treatment outcomes and survival based on drug resistance patterns in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;182:113-9.
Parida SK, Axelsson-Robertson R, Rao MV, Singh N, Master I, Lutckii A, et al.
Totally drug-resistant tuberculosis and adjunct therapies. J Intern Med 2015;277:388-405.
Lange C, Abubakar I, Alffenaar JW, Bothamley G, Caminero JA, Carvalho AC, et al.
Management of patients with multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Europe: A TBNET consensus statement. Eur Respir J 2014;44:23-63.
Kim DH, Kim HJ, Park SK, Kong SJ, Kim YS, Kim TH, et al.
Treatment outcomes and long-term survival in patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;178:1075-82.
Van Rie A, Warren R, Richardson M, Gie RP, Enarson DA, Beyers N, et al.
Classification of drug-resistant tuberculosis in an epidemic area. Lancet 2000;356:22-5.
Jassal M, Bishai WR. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2009;9:19-30.
Thee S, Garcia-Prats AJ, Donald PR, Hesseling AC, Schaaf HS. Fluoroquinolones for the treatment of tuberculosis in children. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2015;95:229-45.
Wang JY, Hsueh PR, Jan IS, Lee LN, Liaw YS, Yang PC, et al.
Empirical treatment with a fluoroquinolone delays the treatment for tuberculosis and is associated with a poor prognosis in endemic areas. Thorax 2006;61:903-8.
Devasia RA, Blackman A, Gebretsadik T, Griffin M, Shintani A, May C, et al.
Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
: The effect of duration and timing of fluoroquinolone exposure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;180:365-70.
King DE, Malone R, Lilley SH. New classification and update on the quinolone antibiotics. Am Fam Physician 2000;61:2741-8.
Hooper DC. Emerging mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:337-41.
De Rossi E, Aínsa JA, Riccardi G. Role of mycobacterial efflux transporters in drug resistance: An unresolved question. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2006;30:36-52.
Singh M, Jadaun GP, Ramdas, Srivastava K, Chauhan V, Mishra R, et al.
Effect of efflux pump inhibitors on drug susceptibility of ofloxacin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates. Indian J Med Res 2011;133:535-40.
] [Full text]
Perichon B, Tankovic J, Courvalin P. Characterization of a mutation in the parE gene that confers fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae
. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:1166-7.
Eaves DJ, Randall L, Gray DT, Buckley A, Woodward MJ, White AP, et al.
Prevalence of mutations within the quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE and association with antibiotic resistance in quinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica
. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:4012-5.
Jawahar MS. Tuberculosis Research Centre. Shortening short course chemotherapy: A randomised clinical trial for treatment of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis with regimens using ofloxacin in the intensive phase. Ind J Tub 2002;49:27.
WHO. Treatment of Tuberculosis Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
Zignol M, Cabibbe AM, Dean AS, Glaziou P, Alikhanova N, Ama C, et al
. Genetic sequencing for surveillance of drug resistance in tuberculosis in highly endemic countries: A multi-country population-based surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:675-83.
Willby M, Sikes RD, Malik S, Metchock B, Posey JE. Correlation between GyrA substitutions and ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin cross-resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59:5427-34.
Selvakumar N, Kumar V, Balaji S, Prabuseenivasan S, Radhakrishnan R, Sekar G, et al.
High rates of ofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
among both new and previously treated patients in Tamil Nadu, South India. PLoS One 2015;10:e0117421.
Dalal A, Pawaskar A, Das M, Desai R, Prabhudesai P, Chhajed P, et al.
Resistance patterns among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in greater metropolitan Mumbai: Trends over time. PLoS One 2015;10:e0116798.
Verma JS, Nair D, Rawat D, Manzoor N. Assessment of trends of ofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
. Indian J Med Microbiol 2011;29:280-2.
] [Full text]
Myneedu VP, Visalakshi P, Verma AK, Behera D, Bhalla M. Prevalence of XDR TB cases – A retrospective study from a tertiary care TB hospital. Indian J Tuberc 2011;58:54-9.
Kamal SM, Hossain A, Sultana S, Begum V, Haque N, Ahmed J, et al.
Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in Bangladesh: Reflections from the first nationwide survey. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2015;19:151-6.
Ghafoor T, Ikram A, Abbasi SA, Zaman G, Ayyub M, Palomino JC, et al.
Sensitivity pattern of second line anti-tuberculosis drugs against clinical isolates of multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015;25:250-3.
Chan RC, Hui M, Chan EW, Au TK, Chin ML, Yip CK, et al.
Genetic and phenotypic characterization of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates in Hong Kong. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;59:866-73.
Zhang Z, Lu J, Wang Y, Pang Y, Zhao Y. Prevalence and molecular characterization of fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:364-9.
Daniel O, Osman E, Bakare R, Adebiyi P, Ige O, Ogiri S, et al
. Ofloxacin resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in two states of south-west Nigeria. Afr J Respir Med 2011;6:18-20.
El Sahly HM, Teeter LD, Jost KC Jr., Dunbar D, Lew J, Graviss EA. Incidence of moxifloxacin resistance in clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates in Houston, Texas. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:2942-5.
Ho J, Jelfs P, Sintchenko V. Fluoroquinolone resistance in non-multidrug-resistant tuberculosis-a surveillance study in New South Wales, Australia, and a review of global resistance rates. Int J Infect Dis 2014;26:149-53.
Lai CC, Tan CK, Huang YT, Liao CH, Hsueh PR. Fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis at a medical centre in Taiwan, 2005-10. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:2437-8.
Park IN, Hong SB, Oh YM, Lim CM, Lee SD, Lew WJ, et al.
Impact of short-term exposure to fluoroquinolones on ofloxacin resistance in HIV-negative patients with tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007;11:319-24.
Tessema B, Beer J, Emmrich F, Sack U, Rodloff AC. First- and second-line anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in Northwest Ethiopia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2012;16:805-11.
van den Boogaard J, Semvua HH, van Ingen J, Mwaigwisya S, van der Laan T, van Soolingen D, et al.
Low rate of fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from northern Tanzania. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:1810-4.
Umubyeyi AN, Rigouts L, Shamputa IC, Fissette K, Elkrim Y, de Rijk PW, et al.
Limited fluoroquinolone resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from Rwanda: Results of a national survey. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;59:1031-3.
Rafiq Y, Jabeen K, Hasan R, Jafri S, Laiq R, Malik F, et al.
Fluoroquinolone resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis
strains from Karachi, Pakistan: Data from community-based field clinics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:929-30.
Casal M, Ruiz P, Herreras A. Study of the in vitro
susceptibility of M. tuberculosis
to ofloxacin in Spain. Spanish Study Group of M. tuberculosis
resistance. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000;4:588-91.
Bozeman L, Burman W, Metchock B, Welch L, Weiner M; Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. Fluoroquinolone susceptibility among Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from the United States and Canada. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:386-91.
Ginsburg AS, Hooper N, Parrish N, Dooley KE, Dorman SE, Booth J, et al.
Fluoroquinolone resistance in patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:1448-52.
Grimaldo ER, Tupasi TE, Rivera AB, Quelapio MI, Cardaño RC, Derilo JO, et al.
Increased resistance to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from patients seen at a tertiary hospital in the Philippines. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001;5:546-50.
Soudani A, Hadjfredj S, Zribi M, Messaoud T, Masmoudi A, Majed B, et al.
First report of molecular characterization of fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from a Tunisian hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010;16:1454-7.
World Health Organization. Technical report on critical concentrations for drug susceptibility testing of medicines used in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (No. WHO/CDS/TB/2018.5). World Health Organization; 2018.
Zheng X, Zheng R, Hu Y, Werngren J, Forsman LD, Mansjö M, et al.
Determination of MIC breakpoints for second-line drugs associated with clinical outcomes in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016;60:4786-92.
Von Groll A, Martin A, Jureen P, Hoffner S, Vandamme P, Portaels F, et al.
Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
and mutations in gyrA and gyrB. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:4498-500.
Sirgel FA, Warren RM, Streicher EM, Victor TC, van Helden PD, Böttger EC. gyrA mutations and phenotypic susceptibility levels to ofloxacin and moxifloxacin in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:1088-93.
Sulochana S, Narayanan S, Paramasivan CN, Suganthi C, Narayanan PR. Analysis of fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
from India. J Chemother 2007;19:166-71.
Pantel A, Petrella S, Matrat S, Brossier F, Bastian S, Reitter D, et al.
DNA gyrase inhibition assays are necessary to demonstrate fluoroquinolone resistance secondary to gyrB mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:4524-9.
Tagliani E, Cabibbe AM, Miotto P, Borroni E, Toro JC, Mansjö M, et al.
Diagnostic performance of the new version (v2.0) of GenoType MTBDRsl assay for detection of resistance to fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable drugs: A multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol 2015;53:2961-9.
Chen Y, Zhao B, Liu HC, Sun Q, Zhao XQ, Liu ZG, et al.
Prevalence of mutations conferring resistance among multi- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates in China. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2016;69:149-52.
Zhao LL, Sun Q, Zeng CY, Chen Y, Zhao B, Liu HC, et al.
Molecular characterisation of extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2015;45:137-43.
Singh P, Jain A, Dixit P, Prakash S, Jaiswal I, Venkatesh V, et al.
Prevalence of gyrA and B gene mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant and -sensitive clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
and their relationship with MIC of ofloxacin. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2015;68:63-6.
Rodwell TC, Valafar F, Douglas J, Qian L, Garfein RS, Chawla A, et al.
Predicting extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
phenotypes with genetic mutations. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:781-9.
Hoshide M, Qian L, Rodrigues C, Warren R, Victor T, Evasco HB 2nd
, et al.
Geographical differences associated with single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in nine gene targets among resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:1322-9.
Ajbani K, Rodrigues C, Shenai S, Mehta A. Mutation detection and accurate diagnosis of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: Report from a tertiary care center in India. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:1588-90.
Siddiqi N, Shamim M, Hussain S, Choudhary RK, Ahmed N, Prachee, et al.
Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
from patients in North India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:443-50.
Nosova EY, Bukatina AA, Isaeva YD, Makarova MV, Galkina KY, Moroz AM. Analysis of mutations in the gyrA and gyrB genes and their association with the resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
to levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin. J Med Microbiol 2013;62:108-13.
Chernyaeva E, Fedorova E, Zhemkova G, Korneev Y, Kozlov A. Characterization of multiple and extensively drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates with different ofloxacin-resistance levels. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2013;93:291-5.
Dymova MA, Cherednichenko AG, Alkhovik OI, Khrapov EA, Petrenko TI, Filipenko ML. Characterization of extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates circulating in Siberia. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:478.
WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
Mao X, Ke Z, Shi X, Liu S, Tang B, Wang J, et al.
Diagnosis of drug resistance to fluoroquinolones, amikacin, capreomycin, kanamycin and ethambutol with genotype MTBDRsl Assay: A meta-analysis. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2015;45:533-44.
Theron G, Peter J, Richardson M, Barnard M, Donegan S, Warren R, et al
. The diagnostic accuracy of the GenoType(®) MTBDRsl assay for the detection of resistance to second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;10:CD010705.
Avalos E, Catanzaro D, Catanzaro A, Ganiats T, Brodine S, Alcaraz J, et al.
Frequency and geographic distribution of gyrA and gyrB mutations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates: A systematic review. PLoS One 2015;10:e0120470.
Sandgren A, Strong M, Muthukrishnan P, Weiner BK, Church GM, Murray MB. Tuberculosis drug resistance mutation database. PLoS Med 2009;6:e2.
Brossier F, Veziris N, Aubry A, Jarlier V, Sougakoff W. Detection by GenoType MTBDRsl test of complex mechanisms of resistance to second-line drugs and ethambutol in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
complex isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:1683-9.
Singh J, Sankar MM, Kumar P, Couvin D, Rastogi N, Singh S, et al.
Genetic diversity and drug susceptibility profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolated from different regions of India. J Infect 2015;71:207-19.
Borgdorff MW, van Soolingen D. The re-emergence of tuberculosis: What have we learnt from molecular epidemiology? Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:889-901.
Devaux I, Kremer K, Heersma H, Van Soolingen D. Clusters of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
cases, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 2009;15:1052-60.
Zhang Z, Lu J, Liu M, Wang Y, Qu G, Li H, et al.
Genotyping and molecular characteristics of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from China. J Infect 2015;70:335-45.
Duong DA, Nguyen TH, Nguyen TN, Dai VH, Dang TM, Vo SK, et al.
Beijing genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
is significantly associated with high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Vietnam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:4835-9.
Martin A, Palomino JC, Portaels F. Rapid detection of ofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
by two low-cost colorimetric methods: Resazurin and nitrate reductase assays. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:1612-6.
Coll F, McNerney R, Preston MD, Guerra-Assunção JA, Warry A, Hill-Cawthorne G, et al.
Rapid determination of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance from whole-genome sequences. Genome Med 2015;7:51.
Kirchhoff J, Glaser U, Bohnert JA, Pletz MW, Popp J, Neugebauer U. Simple ciprofloxacin resistance test and determination of minimal inhibitory concentration within 2 h using Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem 2018;90:1811-8.
Jo KW, Lee SD, Kim WS, Kim DS, Shim TS. Treatment outcomes and moxifloxacin susceptibility in ofloxacin-resistant multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2014;18:39-43.
Kambli P, Ajbani K, Sadani M, Nikam C, Shetty A, Udwadia Z, et al.
Correlating Minimum inhibitory concentrations of ofloxacin and moxifloxacin with gyrA mutations using the genotype MTBDRsl assay. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2015;95:137-41.
Farhat MR, Mitnick CD, Franke MF, Kaur D, Sloutsky A, Murray M, et al.
Concordance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
fluoroquinolone resistance testing: Implications for treatment. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2015;19:339-41.
Sulochana S, Rahman F, Paramasivan CN. In vitro
activity of fluoroquinolones against Mycobacterium tuberculosis
. J Chemother 2005;17:169-73.
[Table 1], [Table 2]